Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Obama and Eugenics

Very simply, eugenics is the science of genetically engineering organisms (specifically human beings) to get the most superior being possible. I FIRMLY believe that Mr. Obama is a eugenist.

Obama formed the Federal Coordinating Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research for the purpose of deciding which health practices are the best and most cost effective. Their recommendation goes to the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (NCFHIT), who will in turn decide when, where, and how a patient is to be treated depending on the diagnosis given by the doctor.

Emanuel co-wrote an article in the Lancet medical journal in which he stated: "Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system—the complete lives system—which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles." (http://www.lancet.com/ January 2009) [emphasis mine]


He goes on to say: "The complete lives system discriminates against older people. Age-based allocation is ageism. Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years. Treating 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life-years is not."


Huh? Isn't that the same thing? Treating a 65 year old because of sterotypes is wrong, but treating them by how many years they've lived is not? What a bunch of double talk.


So now some Committee who has never seen me, doesn't know who I am, what I do, whom I love, is going to decide if I get medical treatment ot not? That's a load of CRAP.


This Council was formed without Congressional approval, (by the President) and given $1.1 BILLION from the Stimulus Act. There are no practicing physicians on this panel. (Dr. Stanley Feld in Better Health Network, Health Policy, News, Research November 22, 2010)


Complete duplicity. That's all we see from Obama's regime.


"Though written in bloodless academic language, Emanuel's discourse most closely resembles one of Adolf Hitler's rambling pronouncements as know-it-all Fuehrer. Emanuel sums up who is to be treated, and who is to die: "When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.'" http://blog.nj.com/njv_publicblog/2009/07/what_armband_is_ezekiel_emanue.html


I don't care HOW the man defends this choice, it is what it is. He may SAY he's not a proponent of legalized euthanasia, yet very clearly demonstrates his position by declaring His "complete life system" theory inherently favors 15-40 year olds. And you know what really gets me? Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel has a sister with cerebral palsy. You'd think there'd be a little better understanding.


I could go on and on, but the point is this: Do I really think that Obama is going to start sending people off to death camps? Of course not.


I do, however, believe that there would be no happier man on the planet than Obama if ever so slowly the weak, the infirm, the demented, the crippled, the disabled and the "less-desirable" were eliminated from the human race. And he'll be even happier when it's done at the hands of his minions instead of his own.

I believe that ALL life is precious. What if Obama's children were born with a fatal disease? Would he withhold treatment from them? Of course not. But would he withhold treatment if YOUR child were born with the same thing? Something to think about, for sure.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Obama and Population Control: Has It Already Begun?

Let’s talk about China for a minute. I can’t even get INTO how they are backing NORTH Korea, and, should they call in our debt, would own the United States. I’m talking about their one-child-per-family law.

For decades, China has imposed a ban on most families, stating they are only allowed to have one child. Notice it’s not one pregnancy, but one child. Since the desired child was male, many Chinese baby girls were left on the steps of orphanages. Chinese women may have several babies before having a boy, and may have given every single one up for the chance to have a son.

On October 21, 2010, “36 year old Xiao Aiying was 8 months pregnant when twelve government officials entered her house, brutally beating and kicking her in the stomach before dragging her kicking and screaming to a state hospital. Her crime? She had conceived a second child and failed to pay the mandatory $40,000 fine for breaking China’s notorious one-child policy.” (www.prisonplanet.com)

This poor woman was held down and given a lethal injection for her baby. She went to the hospital, bruised and beaten, with her dead baby still inside her.

You may be thinking, well, that’s China for goodness sake. They’re halfway around the world, and Communist! That would never happen in the United States.

Really?

President Obama was inaugurated on January 20, 2009. THREE days later, Obama reversed the Mexico City Policy. “The policy required non-governmental organizations to "agree as a condition of their receipt of [U.S.] federal funds" that they would "neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations". The policy had exceptions for abortions done in response to rape, incest, or life-threatening conditions.” (www.en.wikipedia.org)

What a perfect example of Obama’s duality. He said, “"We are reminded that this decision not only protects women's health and reproductive freedom but stands for a broader principle: that government should not intrude on our most private family matters. I remain committed to protecting a woman's right to choose." www.abcnews.go.com Yet his actions prove otherwise! Or maybe he only supports government intruding with our tax dollars for foreign abortions.

Right.

Obama’s nearly trillion dollar “stimulus package” gave over 10 percent to Planned Parenthood. So is this Obama’s tithe? I just find the percentage interesting.

A program from the Clinton Presidency “allows states to seek a waiver to offer Medicaid [Medicaid is not Medicare. Medicaid is completely free.] “family planning” services — including people who are not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid. If they seek the waiver, the federal government matches the state funding with $9 for every $1…”

The economic stimulus plan effectively eliminated the need for the waiver.
“As a result, all 50 states will now offer Medicaid “family planning” services (including contraception) with the federal government offering the same $9 to $1 match. Although the money doesn’t fund abortions directly, it goes to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business, which would otherwise have to spend its own money on contraception.” (www.lifenews.com)

How is that NOT government supported abortion??

Tomorrow I will explore what else I believe Obama’s true feelings are on the government’s role in population control.

Friday, November 19, 2010

This Is The Country OBAMA Supports

The following is an article from Israel Today Magazine, written by Ryan Jones:

"A 50-year-old man from the eastern Jerusalem village of Issawiya tried to stab a young Jewish woman at the nearby Hadassah Mount Scopus Hospital in order to prove to his friends that he is a good Palestinian Arab.

Police said the man followed the young woman for some distance before pulling out a large kitchen knife and running toward her. Fortunately, the young woman reached the guard station at the hospital entrance before her would-be assailant reached her.

After being taken in for questioning, the man admitted that he wanted to kill a Jew in order to prove to his friends that he was not collaborating or sympathizing with Israel.

It is a growing phenomenon that Arabs who would otherwise have little or not problem with Israel and especially with their Jewish neighbors feel pressured to take anti-Israel positions and even engage in terrorist activity." (http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&nid=22284)

Are you KIDDING me? The illustrious American President supports terrorism. I mean, if it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck.

Obama has strong Muslim ties. My personal belief is that he IS Muslim. Muslims MUST adhere strictly to the Qu'ran. The Qu'ran makes it very clear that anyone who is not Muslim must be converted or killed, especially Jews and Christians. {waddle}

Obama clearly supports a Palestinian state, thereby being in DIRECT disobedience to God, Whose chosen people are Israel. Ergo, you could reasonably argue that Obama supports terrorism, or at the VERY least, genocide. {quack}

I was so stunned to read this article; to be frank, it was the age of the offender! The would-be attacker is 50 years old! This isn't some 20 year old hot-head wanna-be trying to join a gang. This is a 50 year old man! Probably established in life, maybe successful, married, with children... Yet is was SO important to him that his friends believe he was a "good Arab" (a good Muslim), that he was willing to KILL a woman.

Keep praying. For our President. For our country. For Israel. It is imperative we are on the Right side of this battle. It will have eternal consequences.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Washington, Lincoln, and OBAMA???

Okay. I know this is silly. I know people are probably shaking their heads at my indignance at such a goofy thing. It's only a Chia Pet.

But I'm sorry. There are three Presidents made into Chia Pets, and they are Washington, Lincoln and Obama??? How they can even mention those three men in the same sentence is beyond my realm of comprehension.

George Washington: fearless leader. Considered the Father of America. Unanimously chosen as both Commander-in-Chief of the Army as well as President of the United States. King George III of England remarked he was "the greatest character of the age." (libertykids.com)

Abraham Lincoln: considered by some to be the best president of all. Ended slavery. Was known as "Honest Abe." Said, "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow and his orphan - to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."

Barak Obama: Supports Iran over Israel. Supports illegal immigrants over Americans. Bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia. Considered worst president of all time by many, even worse than Jimmy Carter. Supports Islam over Christianity. In just 2 years of his presidency, unemployment went up 2.1 percent. The national debt went from $10 trillion to $12 trillion.

Obama has: "allowed the Russians to sponsor an uprising in Kyrgyzstan that resulted in the removal of a U.S. airbase. He has lent legitimacy to an Islamist Turkish government and sold American debt to a communist Chinese government that supports North Korea." (www.townhall.com)

Now I know it may just be a Chia Pet. I know Chia Pets have been made fun of and are notorious white elephant gifts. But even the mere mention of Obama in the same breath as two of the greatest men of all time...well I just couldn't handle that.

The only thing an Obama Chia Pet would be good for is target practice.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Celebrating?

One thing I am for sure ridiculously happy about it the exit of Nancy Polosi. Oh, that woman. She got on every nerve I had. I'm not sure if she ever had one of her own ideas come out of her brain. I think she was primed well. She was also egregiously annoying.

So last night the Rebuplicans took control back of the house. The Dems held on to the Senate, but barely. Michigan got a new Republican Governor, Attorney General and Secretary of State.

I'm not really a Republican anymore, but it is certainly the lesser of two evils. You'll never meet a former Republican Socialist...(well not without a lobotomy anyway); ergo, the lesser of two evils.

I'm THRILLED that the Tea Part movement took 3 elections last night. I would probably lean closer to the Libertarian side of the parties, but I didn't feel like they had enough momentum to carry Michigan, and I certainly didn't want the Democrats to win!

I'm not sure what will be accomplished for this House and Senate under THIS President, but I know Obama will no longer be able to have "his way" as he has in the in the last 2 years. He's the kind of person who makes you think is somethings are very good ideas, and then you end up crippled.

I know I put this on facebook already but I just can't help it: To Ms. Pelosi: Na-na-na- na, Na-na-na-na, Hey Hey Hey, GOOD BYE!!!!!

Thursday, October 21, 2010

The Second Amendment

There is a young man we'll call Jason in a Michigan prison at this very moment because the government failed to recognize the Constitution; specifically the second amendment.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States says:

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. "


Oh the drama this amendment has caused.

Jason was at home caring for his children. All of the sudden, a man started banging on the INNER door of their mudroom. That means the man had already crossed the threshold of the house.

Jason's daughter was on the other side of the door, terrified, and ran to get her daddy. She told him she thought someone was breaking into the house.

Jason grabbed his legally registered handgun, and went to the mudroom door to see what was up. He told the man to get off his property or he'd put "two between his eyes." The man then identified himself as a Rent-A-Center employee (who was not wearing ANY type of uniform) coming for a late payment. Jason apologized, set the gun down immediately. The gun was loaded, but had never been cocked for use.

After the misunderstanding, Mr. Rent-A-Center and Jason had a "cordial conversation" and wrapped things up. In statements given by BOTH parties, these facts are all agreed upon. Yet the Rent-A-Center dude filed a complaint, and now Jason is in prison. He has been there since May of 2009.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? This man was WELL within his second amendment rights, and did everything correctly. He owned the gun legally. It was registered. He was protecting his home, property and children. He told the man to leave his property. It's not like the kid walked up to the door shooting. His wife went into premature labor, and their 3rd child was born 8 weeks early, all while Daddy is in jail.

That family may as well have wiped their butts with the Constitution for all the good it did them.

While there is controversy over the Amendment, I can't believe ANYONE would have a problem with what Jason did.

There are 3 main interpretations of the Second Amendment.

1. The civilian militia interpretation, which holds that the Second Amendment is no longer valid, having been intended to protect a militia system that is no longer in place.
2. The individual rights interpretation, which holds that the individual right to bear arms is a basic right on the same order as the right to free speech.
3. The median interpretation, which holds that the Second Amendment does protect an individual right to bear arms but is restricted by the militia language in some way. (Tom Head About.com)


I personally agree with the second interpretation. The word "militia"has 2 meanings. One is civilians trained as soldiers but not part of the regular army. The second meaning refers to the entire body of physically fit civilians eligable by law for military service. (But not already in the armed forces. Italics and parentheses added).(http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/militia.htm)

No where in the second amendment does it say that civilians may only bear arms during war. This is ridiculous. Thankfully, the NRA is now getting involved and helping to fund Jason's defense. But even if he got out tomorrow, no one can give back the time that has been taken away from him and his young family. He missed the birth of his child, for crying out loud!

The government's controlling grip is getting tighter and tighter. Make no mistake: Obama has a Socialist/Communist agenda, and this is just one tiny example of how it's effecting "Joe Smith" on Main Street USA. And it's only going to get worse.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Historically Speaking...

I am fired up today. It's been a crazy week, what with the holiday weekend, a marathon garage sale, and arcing power lines in my pear tree that Consumer's Energy didn't bother to fix in FIVE days...it took the FIRE department to get them out here to fix it!

I want to state at this point that politically I am neither Republican nor Democrat. I am Conservative, I am a Christian, and I believe our government has entirely too much power, and is a far cry from its original purpose.

James Madison is considered the main author of the Constitution. He is also the man who pushed for a Bill of Rights, to PROTECT the people from governing bodies, and clearly EXPLAIN their place in this newly founded country.

On June 8, 1789, Madison rose to address Congress and impress upon them his urgent desire for these first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. In The Annals of Congress, House of Representatives, First Congress, 1st session, pp 448-460 we find Madison's original intent summed up in his own words:

"I wish, among other reasons why something should be done, that those who have been friendly to the adoption of this constitution may have the opportunity of proving to those who were opposed to it that they were as sincerely devoted to liberty and a Republican Government, as those who charged them with wishing the adoption of this constitution in order to lay the foundation of an aristocracy or despotism. It will be a desirable thing to extinguish from the bosom of every member of the community, any apprehensions that there are those among his countrymen who wish to deprive them of the liberty for which they valiantly fought and honorably bled. And if there are amendments desired of such a nature as will not injure the constitution, and they can be ingrafted so as to give satisfaction to the doubting part of our fellow-citizens, the friends of the Federal Government will evince that spirit of deference and concession for which they have hitherto been distinguished."

Madison wanted to ensure that the people who fought and died for our freedom were guaranteed that this new government would NOT become an aristocracy, or worse, fall into the hands of a despot, as is the case at this moment in United States history, in my humble opinion.

He wanted “First, that there be prefixed to the constitution a declaration, that all power is originally rested in, and consequently derived from, the people. That Government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people…. That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government, whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution.”

Our founding fathers were as concerned about limiting the power of government as they were about their independence from England. They didn’t want to be subjects like they had been. That’s what they bled and died for. If they could see us now. How far we have strayed in just over 200 years. As far as a civilization goes, America is STILL a baby…It terrifies me to think of Her as a toddler with our current President and trends toward Socialism.

And check this out: Madison knew how easily power can get away from where it belongs, WITH THE PEOPLE. He said, “The exceptions here or elsewhere in the constitution, made in favor of particular rights, shall not be so construed as to diminish the just importance of other rights retained by the people, or as to enlarge the powers delegated by the constitution; but either as actual limitations of such powers, or as inserted merely for greater caution.”

Madison goes on to say, “But whatever may be the form which the several States have adopted in making declarations in favor of particular rights, the great object in view is to limit and qualify the powers of Government, by excepting out of the grant of power those cases in which the Government ought not to act, or to act only in a particular mode.” To read the speech in full, go to http://www.usconstitution.net/madisonbor.html I really encourage you to read it all….I would love to put it all here, but there’s a lot, and this is getting too long!!

Do you see what this country was founded on? The power of the PEOPLE to govern THEMSELVES as they see fit. Do you see a welfare program in there anywhere? How about nationalized health care? Insurance companies that tell you which doctor you may or may not go to? Let’s go a step further…helmet laws? Seatbelt laws? Laws that require a person not to drink and drive, not to text or talk on the phone while driving? Where the heck is our common sense??? Do we really need a government mandating this?

I realize that many of the above laws are for our safety. But can you imagine telling James Madison that the government would have the right to tell them when they can see the local doctor? Or that he has to ride his horse a certain way? He would laugh in your face. There really is no difference. We have taken so much for granted! We have been like sheep, dumbly following along and staying mute as our government leads us to the slaughter.

Well I say, SILENT NO MORE! We have right, no, the OBLIGATION to pursue freedom from tyranny and despotism. The very Constitution that began this country demands it! In 1775, Patrick Henry was willing to die for liberty. What are YOU willing to do? Write a letter? Stand out from the crowd? Voice your opinion? VOTE? Strive for change? (A real change…for the BETTER, not the “change” that Obama has brought us: nearer and nearer to Socialism and losing our rights completely!)

What are you willing to do? I can’t physically go out and go door to door. I can’t storm the capital. But I can exercise my First Amendment rights. I can research and try to education and encourage. I want to evoke passion in you! I want to remind you what we REALLY have in America…where we have come from….and where we have gone.

Say it with me: Silent No More!

Monday, August 30, 2010

Obama, Islam and Israel Conclusion

The Qur’an speaks of Jihad (holy war) many times. “To participate in Jihad in Allah’s cause” Al Bukhari vol 1:25 and “During the last days there will appear some young foolish people, who will say the best words, but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will leave the faith) and will go out from their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, wherever you find them, kill them, for whoever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection.” Bukhari vol. 9 no. 64 (italics mine)

Sura 8:57 “So if you gain mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.”

“Allah has given those that fight with their goods and their persons a higher tank than those who stay at home…The unbelievers are your sworn enemies…Seek out your enemies relentlessly….You shall not plead for traitors…Allah does not love the treacherous or the sinful.” (Dawood, Koran, pp. 367-68)

Sura 66:9 “O Prophet! Make war on the infidels and hypocrites, and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their abode! And wretched the passage to it.” I imagine that the passage (to either heaven or hell) for the people who jumped from the Twin Towers’ 87th floor, or burned to death in a puddle of jet fuel was quite wretched indeed.

Again, let me clearly state that all Muslims are NOT terrorists. But many terrorists are Muslim. The Qur’an tells Muslims that the only SURE way to paradise is to die in a Jihad. (Sura 9:111)

“God hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur’an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than God? Then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” Sura 3:157

“And if you are slain, or die in the way of Allah, forgiveness and mercy from Allah are far better than all they could amass.” Al-Imran 3:157

I could go on and on and on. I hope by now you get the point. Much of the Qur’an and the Christian Bible are diametrically opposed; you cannot be both Muslim and Christian. Jesus teaches to turn the other cheek, not retaliate. God tells us to live in peace as long as it is with us. He commands us NOT to kill.

The Qur’an spews violence and hatred in parts, and instructs its followers (Muslims) to participate in Jihad (holy war) and kill anyone who does not believe the same as they do. AND THIS IS THE BOOK THE PRESIDENT TOUTS AS HOLY AND QUOTES FROM WHEN HE IS SPEAKING IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. If that does not strike fear in your heart, you better go to the doctor to make sure you still have a pulse.

So where does Israel fit into this whole picture? Remember the story of Abraham and Sarah in the Bible? God told Abraham he would be the father of many nations. He told Sarah she was going to have a baby….when she was already 90 years old. Sarah got tired of waiting on the Lord, and told her husband to sleep with her maid, Hagar. Hagar bore a son, Ishmael. Sarah became insanely jealous of Hagar and made Abraham send her and her son away. While she was hiding, an angel came and told Hagar that her son would “live in hostility toward all his brothers.”

Sarah eventually has Isaac, and God’s promise is fulfilled. Abraham, whose descendants would outnumber the stars, began with Isaac. Genesis 15 :17-21 speaks of the covenant God made with Abraham. "When the sun had set and darkness had fallen, a smoking firepot with a blazing torch appeared and passed between the pieces. On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, "To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates- the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, 21 Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites."

Today, the nation of Israel is the descendants of Isaac. "Canaan (Kanaʻn; Hebrew: כְּנָעַן Kənáʻan; Arabic: كنعان Kanʻān) is an ancient term for a region encompassing modern-day Israel, Lebanon, the Palestinian territories and adjoining coastal lands, including parts of Jordan, Syria and northeastern Egypt. (www.wikipedia.com)."

So Israel, as a nation today, has the Biblical right to all of these areas.

The Arab nations surrounding her (parts of Syria, Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia) are descendants of Ishmael. And has there not been hostility between the two?

Israel has the LEGAL right to the land as well: "The land was also given to the Jews by the Law of nations:
1878 - Following the Russian/Turkish war, the Berlin Congress of Nations gave full civil rights to the Jews of Palestine.
1917 - When British Forces took Palestine during the World War I, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration which brought forth the concept of a homeland for the Jews.
1922 - The mandate for Palestine was granted to Britain at a meeting of the Allied Supreme Council in San Remo, April 1920.Note: The separation of Transjordan from the terms of the Mandate by Britain in 1922/23 was an illegal act and was in contravention of the agreement of the mandate Article 5. Britain also broke the terms of the agreement (Article 5) in forbidding a Jewish settlement in Transjordan.
1947 - The UN voted for a partition of the land of Palestine between the Jews and the Arabs. 1948 - Israel was accepted into full membership of the UN." (Bless Israel)

God told Israel in Ezekiel 36:22-24
"Therefore say to the house of Israel, 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: It is not for your sake, O house of Israel, that I am going to do these things, but for the sake of my holy name, which you have profaned among the nations where you have gone. I will show the holiness of my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, the name you have profaned among them. Then the nations will know that I am the LORD, declares the Sovereign LORD, when I show myself holy through you before their eyes. " 'For I will take you out of the nations; I will gather you from all the countries and bring you back into your own land."

And what happens to the nations that interfere with Israel's possession of her land?

1 "In those days and at that time, when I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, (not IF, WHEN.)
2 I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning my inheritance, my people Israel, for they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land. Joel 3:1-2

Just because President Obama is making the wrong decisions doesn't mean WE as the nation of America will get away scot free. On the contrary. The passage in Joel doesn't say that the leaders of those nations will be judged, but the nations themselves will be judged. We need to take control of our government by standing up and making known OUR opinions. Let them here YOUR voice. Write the White House. Call you Congressman. Pray, Pray and Pray some more. This country will face the wrath of God. Not if, but when.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Obama, Islam, and Israel Part Two

So say President Obama IS Muslim. What’s so bad about being Muslim anyway? In and of itself, (other than my personal belief that there is only one way to heaven, through Jesus Christ, and that the only God is the God of the Bible)…nothing.

Let’s be very clear about one thing: Not all Muslims are terrorists. I am not attacking the “religion” of Islam; if someone wants to be a Muslim that is their personal choice. I am calling out Mubarack Hussein Obama, and his deception of the American people. This is about a cunning, conniving, and yes I’ll say it, evil presence that has set up House…in White.

Out of one side of his mouth, Obama promises that everything will be better. He has claimed in the past to be a Christian. Read this information, and see if you believe him:

President Obama regales Muslims as excelling in art, and sports. He points out that Muslims have won Nobel Peace Prizes (yes, but so did he…or maybe that’s what he meant!) He also told us, in his official capacity, that Muslims built our tallest building. How about the TWO tall buildings that they demolished with airplanes, killing thousands of men, women and children? How can he possibly gloss over that?

As I stated above, not all Muslims are terrorists, to be sure. However, MOST terrorists are Muslim. ALL NINETEEN terrorists involved in the attacks on the Twin Towers were Muslim.
Obama said, “Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism, it is part of promoting peace.” Seriously? Were you ON the planet during September 11th, 2001?

What?

He is going to “work with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill Zakah, [which is their charitable giving done once a year.] (This is one of the five pillars of Islam which in and of themselves seem harmless.) I don't hear him promising he's going to worh with Christians to ensure that laws benefit givers.

Obama also told the American people that “It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit.” I kid you not. Have you ever heard our fearless leader defend any other religion which such veracity? As they see fit??

Well, let’s check out this religion that we are to let Muslims “practice as they see fit.”

The Qur’an is the holy book of Islam, like the Bible is the Holy Book (for real) of Christianity. The Qur’an says that Muslims should not START with hostility, but “the one who attacks you, you attack him in like manner….whoso defendeth himself after he hath suffered wrong, there is no way [blame] against them.”

Wow. So if I feel wronged (someone cuts me off in traffic, maybe?) I am free to retaliate any way “I see fit” if I am Muslim.

Mohammed (the last and seemingly most important prophet of Islam) said “Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him.” -Hadith Al Buhkari v.9:57

Here is something Muslims may "see fit" to do, from the Qur’an, (Sura 9:5, 29 and 41) “Slay the idolaters [non-Muslims] wherever ye find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush (9-11?). Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the last Day….Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah!”

Sura 4:101-102 says, “When ye travel through the earth, there is not blame on you if ye shorten your prayers, for fear the Unbelievers May attack you: For the Unbelievers are unto you open enemies. For the Unbelievers, Allah has prepared a humiliating punishment.”

I want to make sure this is clear: ANY Unbeliever, Jew, Christian, whatever, is an infidel and to be treated as described in the Qur'an.

One translation of Sura 8:59-60 states: “The infidels [unbelievers in Allah] should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.” That is pretty clear, and pretty frightening.

It is important to note that devout Muslims will claim that because the Qur’an is written in Arabic, we cannot understand it, therefore our English translations can’t be accurate. However, the translations were done by Muslims who speak Arabic AND English. Do you really think they would make translation errors in the negative toward Islam? Highly unlikely.

Tomorrow's post will be more from the Qur'an, Obama's quotes about Islam and being Muslim, and about how Israel fits into all of this. Have a blessed week!

Friday, August 27, 2010

Obama, Islam and Israel Part One

Hold on to your knickers boys and girls... this is going to be a wild ride! A friend of mine introduced me to Ari Lipkin (pen name V. Mordecai). He has some very interesting beliefs about Obama and Islam.

Bear with the hint of conspiracy theorise, and please read this through with an open mind and willing spirit. I think God is speaking loud and clear, and we need to get the crud out of our ears and listen before it's too late...if it isn't already!

Mr. Lipkin has been trying to warn us about fanatical Muslims for years. His wife Rachel listens to Saudi Arabia and Egyptian news reports and translates them. Some of the things she hears are simply shocking. Avi Lipkin believes that Mr. Obama may be an actual plant from Saudi Arabia, sent to confuse us, and benefit THEIR cause. I know....just keep reading.

One Saudi Arabian news report had a high government official saying "we will have a Muslim in the White House in 2008." Another quotes the foreign minister of Egypt saying, "Mr. Obama told me he was a Muslim." So then in my opinion, we must decide if Obama is truly a Muslim for the Lipkins' views to pass muster.

First of all, both Obama's biological father and step-father were of the Sunni Muslim tribe. According to Muslim faith, if a father is Muslim, his son is as well. For the first 11 years of his life, Obama was raised Muslim, "waking every morning to the sound of salat" (the call to the first of five required daily prayers of the Muslim faith). Those are Obama's words in quotes.

Also let's not forget that he BOWED before the King of Saudi Arabia.

The following are statements taken word for word from Obama's televised speeches. When put together, they are very damning.

"I have a problem with some domestic issues, and as soon as I finish with health care, you Muslims will see what I will do for Islam regarding Israel."

WHAT???

"I have known Islam on 3 continents....it guides my convictions."

"I have a deep appreciation for the Muslim faith. My Muslim faith..." {Keep in mind that the Qur'an (the holy book of Muslims) commands Muslims to "deceive the infidels." Infidels are any who do not follow Allah.}

"Civilization owes a debt to Islam." According to President Obama, Islam founded the following: Algebra (Arabs used Algebra in the 7th and 8th centuries. Hindus, Greeks, Babylonians and Egyptians all used Algebra before Christ.)

The magnetic compass (Um, nope. Ask the Chinese about that...they invented it.)

Pens and printing (Well, technically the Greeks (who by the way are not Muslims) were the first to create a pen and paper system.)

How disease works and how it is spread, and how it is healed. (Um, the Bible talked about this....anyone ever heard of leprosy?? Or Jesus healing the sick?)

FOUR different times in one speech, Obama said "The Holy Qur'an teaches us," or "The Holy Qur'an tells us." I've never heard him say "The Holy Bible teaches us that..."

Obama also said "Iran is a great and celebrated culture, and has made the world a better place." Well they DID invent butter, so I might give him that one.

In my opinion, it is VERY clear, from is own admissions, that Mubarack Hussein Obama is a Muslim. With Muslim faith. Who follows the Qur'an. Who is NOT a Christian. Who is a danger to our country. Who we should NOT trust for one second. Who does NOT have America's best interests at heart, but rather Muslim's best interess. Why? I'll tell you in part two!

Stay tuned!

Sunday, August 22, 2010

The Road to Socalism Part Two

A friend of mine made a very accurate comment on the previous post. Obama isn't exactly a Socialist himself in the matter of ACTING like one....I don't think HE'S spreading anyone's wealth but OURS (and our children's, and grandchildren's), and I can't imagine he and "her highness" would ever receive nationalized health care.

So let me rephrase: Obama is a power-hungry, money-grubbing, smooth-talking (when the teleprompter is working) country-bankrupting despot who is forcing Socialism on his subjects so that they will indeed be HIS SUBJECTS.

What really bothers me is that Socialism is in direct contrast to Christianity. Yet, in an interview with Christianity Today, January 22, 2008, Obama said, "I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ."

Then, from the May 2010 issue of 'Israel Today,' page 3, in the article titled "Obama, a 'Strategic Catastrophe,'" by Aviel Schneider: "The feeling among the Israeli public is that Obama is appeasing the Muslim world at the expense of Israel."

"The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim," said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV."

On August 13, 2010, in One News Now Obama was quoted as saying "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

Times they are a-changin'. Or is it just the Politician doing his thing? Which is he? Christian? Muslim? I'm pretty sure you can't be both. Not even if you're the President.

So back to Socalism vs. Christianity: Let me just say, that in my opinion, our fearless leader does not ACT like a Bible believing Christian. I cannot judge his soul; only God knows the truth.

However, the primary command by the God of the Bible is to "Love your neighbor as yourself." (Mark 12:31) Our neighbor is anyone we come in contact with. It is the Christian's responsibility to take care of the widows and orphans. It is the CHURCH who are supposed to be taking care of the poor, feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and visiting the sick. THAT'S what it's all about.

Socialism is in direct contrast to that! Let the government help you. Let the government tax the crap out of everyone who has worked hard to get where they are and give it to someone who hasn't earned it and may not deserve it. Let the government decide who you will help with your money. What, you don't want to support the perfectly healthy person who "can't" get a job? Sorry. Socialism says "not your choice." I know a person who has not worked in years. Literally years. And yet because they 2 children, this person sits on his or her butt and collects welfare. Could they work? Absolutely! Anything wrong with this person physically or mentally to prohibit them from working? Nope. But MY taxes, YOUR taxes, OUR hard-earned money is paying for this laziness. That makes me angry. How about you?

Do you know what suffered first in the "budget" of the Christian? Giving to missionaries. Eighty percent of missionary support comes from the United States. The government taxed and taxed and taxed some more to pay for money they've already spent, to the detriment of the American family.

18Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age." Matthew 28

How can we do that if we don't have money to give?

Our coutry is in crisis. Do not be fooled. God will not hold his wrath forever. Please join me in committing to pray for our nation, and its leaders, daily.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The Road To Socialism Part One

So what is the definition of Socialism? According to Merriam-Webster it is:

1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state {government} parentheses mine

3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

How does this sound okay to ANYONE? Remember, the government was not formed to take care of us! The government was formed to protect us! Our liberty. Our freedom. Our economy. Our safety. Under GOD Almighty.

Winston Churchill said, "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

The equal sharing of misery. No kidding.

President Obama's agenda includes Socialism, do not be fooled. Don't take it from me...take it from the horse's mouth:

"They don't want the whole pie," she told the women. "There are some who do, but most Americans feel blessed just being able to thrive a little bit. But that is becoming even more out of reach. If we don't wake up as a nation with a new kind of leadership, for how we want this country to work, then we won't get universal health care. The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more."- Michelle Obama (italics mine)

"It’s because you have an obligation to yourself. Because our individual salvation depends on collective salvation." - Barack Obama (italics mine)

"I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets." - Barack Obama (Dreams of My Father) (emphasis mine)

DO NOT BE MISTAKEN. Obama is a Socialist.

"Among other things, he is concerned about the "winner-take-all" economy where, he says, "the gains from economic growth skew heavily toward the wealthy." Actually, the gains from economic growth can skew toward anyone willing to work hard and make personal and family decisions that improve their chances for success. This is boilerplate wealth redistribution, an economic philosophy at the center of the former Soviet Union. Obama and Democrats wish to embrace it now in order to make more people dependent on government, rather than encourage people to rely on themselves and the opportunity America offers to most citizens, even illegal aliens. Guaranteed equal outcome is socialism. America was built on and sustained by a "can do" spirit. Today, too many are taught a "can't do" spirit. They are told that because of factors over which they have no control -- race, class, poverty -- it is impossible for them to do anything for themselves and so they must increasingly rely on government. Government doesn't cure poverty." Source: Cal Thomas via pressdemocrat (emphasis mine)

I will continue this series on America's road to Socialism over the next several days. Something to leave you with:

Famous Socialists:
Karl Marx
Hugo Chavez
Vladimer Lenin
Golda Meir
Che Guevera

Hilter?

Monday, August 16, 2010

Obama's Support of Invalidating Ground Zero

Okay. This topic has me HOT under the collar. I mean HOT.

There are plans to put up a mosque 2 blocks from ground zero. This would be a Muslim house of worship. Now, I have NOTHING against peaceful Muslims. I do not think that just because someone is Muslim they are a terrorist. I think they are wrong in their religious beliefs, because as I stated in an earlier post, Jesus Christ is THE Way THE Truth and THE Life...no one gets to the Father but through HIM. (John 14:6)

A wealthy business man in New York City compared the building of a mosque at Ground Zero similar to the Japanese asking to build a memorial to kamikaze pilots at Pearl Harbor. While this man has nothing against Japanese people in general, it WAS the Japanese who killed hundreds of Americans there. (So you say, "Americans have killed Japanese in our wars," and I agree; but you don't see a statue of the Enola Gay in Hiroshima, do you??) Same. Thing.

From Eric Werner, AP Washington:

"As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country," Obama told an intently listening crowd gathered at the White House Friday evening to observe the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

But there will be NO prayer in public schools. There will be no ten commandments in any federal building anywhere in the states. Look at our money! "In God We Trust." That is our Natoinal Motto Enacted by Congress in 1956. Not "In Allah we trust," or "In Buddha we trust" but IN GOD WE TRUST. For generations to come.

Do you know what the Supreme Court justices see when they walk into their building? Moses holding the ten commandments. And on the doors of the courtroom in which they preside? Moses. Ten Commandments.

James Madison, the 4th President of our country said this:
"We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."

Patrick Henry, one of our Founding Fathers said: "It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians, not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ." I'm sure if some of the founding fathers of this nation could see what is happening today, they would simply weep.

An American president supporting the building of this mosque at Ground Zero is just shameful. Obama is completely invalidating the fallen of the Twin Towers on 9/11. He is more concerned with his personal agenda and protecting his political butt than honoring the memories of innocent men, women, and children who died that day, because of RADICAL Muslims. I am impatiently waiting for my "Impeach Obama" bumper sticker.

According to the aforementioned AP article, a full 70% of Americans do NOT support the building of the mosque at Ground Zero. And this was reported by CNN, who can hardly be labeled as conservative. I am not at all saying that Muslims don't have a right to worship as they believe, and build mosques to worship in. But have some respect people. Seriously.